Ask is designed for experimental reflection, not prediction. AI can produce incorrect or invented claims; a confident reply does not establish what will happen.
Calculated positions are interpreted through a traditional framework, whose personal meanings are not scientifically validated assessments. Cofelt uses it as context for reflection, not as a way to tell you what specific event will happen on a specific date.
A pattern can be explored as an interpretation. It is not evidence for a forecast, deadline, or verdict.
If you ask Ask "will I get the job?", it has no reliable way to know the outcome. It can help you examine the question and any relevant pattern, but the decision stays yours and the outcome stays uncertain.
This boundary is intentional. A pattern can offer context, but it cannot establish what will happen next.
If a reading ever feels like a prediction, please flag it (👎 button below the message). That feedback helps us tighten the voice.